Caisson Foundations vs Helical Piers: The Colorado Comparison

Drill rig with a steel casing over a drilled shaft, the hole for a caisson foundation, with auger spoils piled beside it
A cased drilled shaft on a Massachusetts transit project being cleaned out before the rebar cage and concrete go in. Spoils, casing and a big rig are part of every caisson job. Photo: MassDOT (Green Line Extension, April 2019), via Wikimedia Commons · Source · Public domain

A caisson foundation, the way builders in Denver use the word, is a set of drilled concrete piers that reach down through swelling clay to stable soil or bedrock, with a reinforced grade beam spanning between them and an open void under the beam so the clay can’t push it up. Engineers call them drilled piers or drilled shafts. On the Front Range they’ve been the default answer to expansive soil for decades. Helical piles do the same structural job with steel instead of concrete, and for many houses, additions and decks they’re the simpler way to get there.

If you searched “caisson foundation” and found pages about bridge piers sunk into rivers, that’s the other meaning. Here’s how the two fit together, and how to decide between a drilled caisson and a helical pile on a Colorado lot.

Two very different things called a caisson

The top results for this term describe marine caissons: open, box, pneumatic and floating caissons, huge watertight structures sunk to build bridge piers and harbor walls. Pneumatic caissons ran under compressed air so crews could dig below the water, which is where “caisson disease,” decompression sickness, got its name. Those are real, but you won’t see one under a house.

What Colorado builders, engineers and soils reports mean by caisson is the drilled pier. A rig augers a round hole, a rebar cage goes in, and the hole is filled with concrete. FHWA’s drilled shaft manual (GEC 10) covers the same element under the name “drilled shaft.” Same thing, three names.

Why drilled piers became the Front Range standard

The Colorado Geological Survey calls swelling soil the most significant, widespread and costly geologic hazard in the state. Its expansive-soil page says clays can expand up to 20 percent by volume when wetted and push with a force of up to 30,000 pounds per square foot. A house footing at 3 feet doesn’t stand a chance against that if the clay under it gets wet unevenly.

Back in 1978, a CGS homeowner guide written by Wesley Holtz and Stephen Hart for the American Society of Civil Engineers laid out the approach still used today. In areas with moderately to highly swelling soils, “drilled pier and grade beam, or ‘caisson,’ foundations are generally recommended.” The guide’s reasoning:

  • Put the bottom of each pier well below the zone where soil moisture changes with the seasons.
  • Anchor the pier in non-swelling soil so the clay can’t jack it upward. That’s done by belling the bottom, grooving the hole near the bottom, or simply going deep enough.
  • Leave a 3 to 6 inch space between the soil and the grade beam, so the building’s weight goes onto the piers and the clay has room to swell without lifting the beam.

That space is what the cardboard void forms you see under Colorado grade beams are for. The modern building code says the same thing in general terms. Section 1808.6.1 of the Denver building code (2024 IBC) requires foundations in the active zone of expansive soil to be designed to resist differential volume changes and prevent structural damage. A deep foundation that bypasses the active zone is the usual way to meet it.

How a drilled caisson foundation gets built

EVstudio, a Denver architecture and engineering firm, documented a drilled pier job on a mixed-use project in 2024. The sequence is typical:

  1. Grade the site to the top-of-pier elevation.
  2. Build rebar cages, designed for gravity, lateral load and uplift from swelling soil, either in a shop or on site.
  3. Drill the hole in lifts with a large auger, lifting it out to clear the cuttings each time and switching to heavier bits at bedrock. Where groundwater is high, the hole gets a steel casing so wet soil doesn’t cave in before the concrete goes in.
  4. Drop the cage, with chairs to hold it centered and off the bottom.
  5. Pump the concrete.

Inspections run alongside: confirming each shaft reached the required depth and bedrock embedment (bedrock isn’t flat, so depths vary pier to pier), checking the rebar against the drawings, and taking concrete samples that are tested over 28 days or more. After that, the grade beam is formed over void forms and poured, and the walls or framing go on top of it.

The code adds a few rules. Uncased cast-in-place piers must be at least 12 inches in diameter, and longer than 30 times their diameter only with a registered design professional directly supervising (IBC 1810.3.5.2.2). Through unstable soil, the hole must be held open with casing, slurry or another approved method before concrete is placed (1810.4.1.2). Cast-in-place deep foundations get special inspection under Section 1705.8.

Where caissons go wrong

The CGS lists the construction problems it sees on expansive soil, and several are caisson-specific:

  • Pier too short or too narrow. A pier that stops inside the swelling zone gets lifted with it.
  • Mushroom tops. If concrete spills over the top of the hole and hardens into a lip, the swelling clay has something to grab and push up.
  • Missing or crushed void space under the grade beam. Once the void is gone, the clay pushes directly on the beam, which is exactly what the piers were supposed to prevent.

None of those is a design flaw in caissons. They’re execution problems, which is why the depth checks and inspections matter.

Caissons vs helical piles, side by side

A helical pile is a steel shaft with one or more helix plates welded near the tip, turned into the ground by a hydraulic drive head. It reaches the same target as a caisson, competent soil below the active zone, but gets there without an open hole.

Drilled caisson (concrete pier)Helical pile
EquipmentTruck- or track-mounted drill rig, concrete pump, rebar crewExcavator, skid steer or compact machine with a drive head
Open holeYes. May need casing in groundwater or caving soilNo. The shaft displaces soil as it screws in
SpoilsAuger cuttings to haul off or spreadPractically none
Capacity checkDepth and bedrock embedment inspected; concrete strength tested over 28+ daysInstallation torque logged on every pile, installed to the torque and depth set by the design professional (IBC 1810.4.11)
When it can take loadAfter the concrete gains strengthOnce installed (HomeGuide lists “verifiable and immediate load-bearing capacity” as a helical advantage)
Uplift from swelling clayResisted by reinforcement, depth and anchorage in non-swelling soilResisted by helix plates bearing in the soil below the active zone
Very heavy loadsStrong suit. Large diameters and rock sockets carry big column loadsPossible with larger shafts and pile groups, but caissons are often more economical
Hard bedrock or cobblesCan drill and socket into rockHelixes can’t screw into hard rock and may reach refusal early
Special inspectionIBC 1705.8IBC 1705.9

Both still need a grade beam or pile caps on top, and on swelling soil both still need the void under the beam. Helical piles change the deep part of the foundation. The concrete above ground is the same job either way, done by the concrete contractor.

Which one fits your project

Drilled caissons make sense on big, heavy buildings, on sites where the design calls for sockets into hard bedrock, and where the soils report shows cobbles or rock that a helix won’t get through. If a drilling contractor can bring a full-size rig in and the schedule allows for concrete to cure, a caisson foundation is a proven choice.

Helical piles tend to win on:

  • Tight lots, backyards and alley access where a drill rig and concrete pump can’t easily reach.
  • Sites with shallow groundwater, where an open hole would need casing and pumping.
  • Additions next to an existing house, where you don’t want auger spoils and a pump truck in the side yard.
  • Decks, porches, sheds and other light structures, where a drilled pier is far more foundation than the load needs.
  • Winter schedules, since steel piles don’t wait on concrete in the ground.

Most projects don’t get to choose freely. The geotechnical engineer’s report and the structural engineer’s design decide what’s allowed, and on many Front Range lots both options appear in the report. Ask your engineer whether helical piles were considered, and ask for a price both ways.

Planning a pier foundation?

Site Safe Helical Piers installs helical piles for new homes, additions, decks and commercial work across Denver and the Colorado Front Range. We don’t drill caissons or pour concrete, so we’ll tell you straight when your soils report points to drilled piers instead. Call 970-673-5615 or send us your plans and soils report. For more background, read our comparison of helical piers and concrete footings, our guide to foundations for expansive soil, or see our services.

FAQ

What is a caisson foundation?

In bridge and marine work, a caisson is a large watertight structure sunk to build a foundation below water. In Colorado homebuilding, “caisson” means a drilled concrete pier: an augered hole filled with rebar and concrete, reaching below swelling clay, usually with a grade beam on top.

What is the difference between a caisson and a pile?

Both are deep foundations. A caisson (drilled pier) is cast in a drilled hole. A pile is a manufactured element driven or screwed into the ground, such as a steel helical pile. They carry load the same way, by reaching firmer soil or rock below the surface.

Why do Colorado houses have caissons?

Because of swelling soil. The Colorado Geological Survey’s guidance has long recommended drilled pier and grade beam foundations where soils swell moderately to highly, with the pier bottoms below the zone of seasonal moisture change and a void left under the grade beam.

Are helical piles as good as caissons?

For the loads in most houses, additions and decks, helical piles reach the same bearing soil and can carry the design load, with a torque reading on each pile. Caissons are often the better choice for very heavy loads or where piers must be socketed into hard bedrock. Your engineer makes the call based on the soils report.

What are the disadvantages of caissons?

They need a large drill rig and a concrete pump, produce spoils, may need casing in groundwater, and can’t carry full load until the concrete has gained strength. Quality depends on reaching the right depth and avoiding problems like mushroom tops.

Sources

  1. Colorado Geological Survey, Special Publication 11, Home Construction on Shrinking and Swelling Soils (Holtz and Hart for ASCE, 1978)
  2. Colorado Geological Survey, Expansive Soil and Rock
  3. EVstudio, Installing Drilled Concrete Piers (July 16, 2024)
  4. Denver Commercial Building Code 2025 (2024 IBC with Denver amendments), Chapter 18 Soils and Foundations (1803.5.3, 1808.6, 1810.3.5.2, 1810.4.1.2, 1810.4.11, 1810.4.12)
  5. Geoengineer.org, Caisson Foundations
  6. FHWA, Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and LRFD Design Methods (FHWA-NHI-10-016, GEC 10, 2010)
  7. HomeGuide, How Much Do Helical Piers Cost? (helical piers vs concrete footings comparison, Feb 2026)

Topics: caissons, drilled piers, helical piles, expansive soil, deep foundations, Colorado

Get your free estimate

You’ll see why we’ve earned the reputation as being one of the top new construction foundation companies in Colorado & why we offer a rock solid guarantee to back it up.

Call now

970-673-5615

Free estimate